Direct Election.

During a wedding, we make lot of sweets and mithais. We may ask the kids to be in charge of those sweets.

We know that the kids may eat a few. But still we tell those kids, don't eat all sweets; it is for the guests.

Sometimes, we instill fear in them that these sweets are for gods; if you eat them, god will poke your eyes; that is what happened to some bad characters in Ramayana or Mahabaratha.

Sometimes, we bribe them also. We tell the kids, if you don't touch these sweets, next week, we will take you to Disney or some amusement park. Kids won't even touch them. We corrupt the minds of the kids.

That is the story, Modi is now sharing with Yeddyurappa. Yeddy, you did steal; so you're just the MP. I didn't touch them; so I am going to be the PM.

So, both Narendra Modi and Yeddyurappa are the lotus from the same pool. Narendra Modi is in noway cleaner than Yeddyurappa.

Cho Ramasamy had never supported or endorsed any leader. But, Cho Ramasamy supports Narendra Modi.

திருவள்ளுவர் சொல்லி இருக்கார். எப்பொருள் யார்யார்வாய் கேட்பினும், மெய்ப்பொருள் காண்பது, அவர் அவரது பொறுப்பு.

நரேந்திர மோடியின் அகமும், புறமும் வேறுவேறாக இருக்கின்றது. ஆதலால், நரேந்திர மோடியின், இயற்கை குணங்களை அறிந்து கொள்ளவே முடிவதில்லை. சோ இராமசாமிக்கும், அதே தடுமாற்றம் தான்.

Had it been America, Narendra Modi's techniques; all would have worked very well.

There in America, every vote comes to the candidate directly from the people.

In India, it is not like that. There is no point in travelling across the country.

For instance, a person in Karnataka would like to vote for Narendra Modi. But that person don't want to vote for Yeddyurappa. So, that person mind will be in a conflict. This person has to overcome his conflict and have to vote for Yeddyurappa; which in turn will be considered as a vote for Narendra Modi to become the PM.

You don't have any such contradictions in America.

In India, all regional leaders are prepared to amend the constitution to give the power to the people for direct election of their Mayor; their Chief Minister; their Prime Minister.

Only Congress and BJP were opposing it. Now, Narendra Modi has become the victim of this indirect election.

Had Narendra Modi understood these differences between the American and Indian democracy, he would have played totally a different game.

Had Narendra Modi been a whole person; without a division between the inner and the outer, then even Cho Ramasamy could have read his game plan clearly and would have pointed out the defects.

The best plan would have been; Narendra Modi sponsors Lal Kishan Advani for the PM. Naturally, Narendra Modi will be for the Deputy PM.

Then it will become the responsibility of Lal Kishan Advani to manage the team internally; and also seeking for political alignment from each state. Entire BJP team will be campaigning against Congress and other regional parties.

Now, all his hard works will go waste.

The crowd will not convert into votes. When Anna Hazare was in Delhi, the world was witnessing the crowd. Now, what happen; same is true for Narendra Modi.

Who can become the Prime Minister of India?

The first criteria is, obviously a leader with the support of people; may not be whole of India; at least a part of India.

Second criteria is, field tested leader. People don't believe in a very clean image. People accepts a leader who learnt from mistakes.

Third criteria is; could bring all others closer onto a platform. For instance, bringing Mamata Bannerjee and Communists together; bringing Mulayam and Mayawathi together.

Narendra Modi made these jobs very easier. Now, all leaders are opposing Narendra Modi.

All tese tasks are not simple.

The very easy and simple task is - change the constitution.

Narendra Modi may start that struggle - change the constitution.

With the help of people, Narendra Modi may lead that struggle.